<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Removing the confusion: a DSL can be much more than just a Fluent Interface.</title>
	<link>http://rubydoes.net/2007/10/14/removing-the-confusion-a-dsl-can-be-much-more-than-just-a-fluent-interface/</link>
	<description>and we love it</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Miranda</title>
		<link>http://rubydoes.net/2007/10/14/removing-the-confusion-a-dsl-can-be-much-more-than-just-a-fluent-interface/#comment-31</link>
		<author>Eduardo Miranda</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rubydoes.net/2007/10/14/removing-the-confusion-a-dsl-can-be-much-more-than-just-a-fluent-interface/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Ayende (http://www.ayende.com/blog/) is showing several DSL samples using boo (http://boo.codehaus.org/), which could be classified as a "static compiled dynamic language"?!

Anyway, I think IronRuby will also be a good alternative to DSL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayende (http://www.ayende.com/blog/) is showing several DSL samples using boo (http://boo.codehaus.org/), which could be classified as a &#8220;static compiled dynamic language&#8221;?!</p>
<p>Anyway, I think IronRuby will also be a good alternative to DSL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
