<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starting to dig through the tests</title>
	<link>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/</link>
	<description>and we love it</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Groß</title>
		<link>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/#comment-4</link>
		<author>Florian Groß</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Please let me point out that the IronRuby specs are based on the ones from Rubinius.

Rubinius has mini-spec which allows it to use rspec-notation without actually being able to run RSpec.

Those specs are designed to be useful for *all* Ruby implementations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let me point out that the IronRuby specs are based on the ones from Rubinius.</p>
<p>Rubinius has mini-spec which allows it to use rspec-notation without actually being able to run RSpec.</p>
<p>Those specs are designed to be useful for *all* Ruby implementations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tranqy</title>
		<link>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/#comment-3</link>
		<author>tranqy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Not at all.. The little I've seen of rspec has been impressive. Of course we're all wondering what it will take to bring packages like rspec over, but not sure it's time to ask that yet  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all.. The little I&#8217;ve seen of rspec has been impressive. Of course we&#8217;re all wondering what it will take to bring packages like rspec over, but not sure it&#8217;s time to ask that yet  <img src='http://rubydoes.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Woodhouse</title>
		<link>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/#comment-2</link>
		<author>Mike Woodhouse</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rubydoes.net/2007/07/25/starting-to-dig-through-the-tests/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Looks rather like rspec, possibly a stripped-down subset thereof. 

http://rspec.rubyforge.org/

Doesn't make it a bad thing, mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks rather like rspec, possibly a stripped-down subset thereof. </p>
<p><a href="http://rspec.rubyforge.org/" rel="nofollow">http://rspec.rubyforge.org/</a></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t make it a bad thing, mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
